Home  |  Login  |  Inquiries | TOC Alerts  |  Sitemap |  

Advanced Search
J Exerc Rehabil > Volume 19(4);2023 > Article
Park and Kim: Effects of exercise therapy on the balance and gait after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

The situation is such that there is a lack of research analyzing the effect of exercise therapy during the rehabilitation period of patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the effects of exercise therapy on the balance and gait of patients after THA. The studies selected for this study were based on the PICO as follows: P (Patient)-patients after THA, I (Intervention)-exercise therapy, C (Comparison)-control and other therapy groups, O (Outcome)-balance and gait. Additional criteria for this study were study design (randomized controlled study), language (English), publication status (journal), and the year of publication were not limited. Eleven studies were included. The effects of exercise therapy on balance and gait in patients after THA were significantly different. Balance: standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.51; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.24–0.78; I2=22%. Gait: SMD, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.01–0.76; I2=66%. Rehabilitation specialists recommend that exercise therapy be included in rehabilitation programs to improve balance and gait in patients after THA. Further research is needed in the future, including more studies and a network meta-analysis that analyzes the effect size of each exercise therapy.

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed surgically in cases such as femoral fracture (Guyen, 2019), arthritis (Gademan et al., 2016), developmental dysplasia of the hip (Greber et al., 2017), and osteonecrosis (Kuroda et al., 2021). Most patients experience disabilities such as muscle weakness, balance and gait disorders with severe pain before THA (Hunter and Bierma-Zeinstra, 2019; Picorelli et al., 2018; Rasch et al., 2007). After THA, patients experience reduced pain and improved hip joint function and quality of life (Bahl et al., 2018; Nguyen et al., 2019; Shan et al., 2014). However, some patients may experience balance problems due to decreased proprioception after THA (Wareńczak and Lisiński, 2019). Balance problems have been reported to persist for up to 5 years after THA (Labanca et al., 2021), and they can also contribute to an increased risk of falls and decreased quality of life (Bobić Lucić and Grazio, 2018; Lo et al., 2019). As such, balance disorders can occur both before and after THA, and in some cases, patients may require revision surgery if they experience falls after THA (Lands et al., 2021).
Exercise therapy must be executed in a systematic manner based on exercise prescription. One of the typical principles in exercise prescription is the FITT principle. FITT stands for frequency, intensity, time, and type (Garber et al., 2011). Exercise therapy can lead to side effects if performed incorrectly (Niemeijer et al., 2020). Therefore, it is important to perform exercise therapy in a systematic manner.
Following THA, patients typically undergo exercise therapy as part of the rehabilitation process (Bandholm and Kehlet, 2012). Physical therapists frequently employ exercise therapy, including gait training, range of motion exercises, and balance training after THA (Peter et al., 2014). Exercise therapy has shown to reduce pain and improve physical activity levels in patients (Wu et al., 2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis reported the effectiveness of exercise therapy on muscle strength and gait after THA (Chen et al., 2021; Coulter et al., 2013). However, the evidence regarding the effects of exercise therapy on balance was found to be insufficient in the systematic review.
Previous systematic reviews have examined the role of exercise therapy on balance before and after THA and total knee arthroplasty (Domínguez-Navarro et al., 2018). However, only one study included in the analysis investigated the intervention after THA. Additionally, other systematic reviews conducted to evaluate balance after THA emphasized the need for further research on interventions (Di Laura Frattura et al., 2022; Labanca et al., 2021). Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the effects of exercise therapy on the balance and gait of patients after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Protocol and registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in the PROSPERO (no. CRD42022343300). We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines while reporting this study (Page et al., 2021).

Eligibility criteria

The selection criteria for this study were based on the PICO-study design criteria, which includes patient (P: patients after THA or total hip replacement), intervention (I: exercise therapy), comparison (C: control and other interventions), outcome (O: balance, gait), and study design (randomized controlled study). The reporting characteristics were language (English) and publication status (journal), and the year of publication was not limited.

Search strategy

Articles relevant to the research question were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL. Each database was searched from their inception until June 30, 2022. For PubMed searches, the search terms are ((“Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip” [Mesh]) OR (“Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip”[TIAB]) OR (“total hip arthroplasty”[TIAB]) OR (“total hip replacement”[TIAB])) AND ((“Rehabilitation”[Mesh]) OR (“Exercise Therapy”[Mesh]) OR (“Rehabilitation”[TIAB]) OR (“Exercise Therapy”[TIAB])).

Study selection

Duplicate studies were identified and excluded using a bibliography management software (EndNote X9, Clarivate Analytics, London, UK). Two reviewers independently assessed eligible studies by screening their titles and abstracts and checking the full-text of the selected articles. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was sought between the reviewers.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two reviewers using a standardized data collection form for the following data: year of publication, first author’s name, country, patient characteristics, intervention method, outcomes, and results. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was sought between the reviewers.

Risk of bias assessment

The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the articles selected for this study. This tool was developed to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (Sterne et al., 2019).

Statistical analyses

The meta-analysis was performed using a R program (The R Project for Statistical Computing version 4.0.3, ‘meta’ package; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). In the meta-analysis, when comparing the outcomes measured on different scales, the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used. The subgroup analysis was performed according to the duration of intervention in terms of the overall effect size on balance and gait. Reporting bias refers to the convenience of publishing research results; hence, a visual analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Search results

A PRISMA study selection flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. In total, 11,648 studies were identified, with 8,000 remaining after duplicates were removed. Next, 7,937 studies were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts, leaving 63 articles for full-text review. Of the 63 articles, 52 were excluded after a full-text review, leaving 11 articles for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis.

Characteristics of the studies

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the selected studies included in this analysis. 11 randomized controlled trials were included and the publication years ranged from 2003 to 2022. The number of study participants ranged from 20 to 79. The included studies were classified according to duration of intervention. A study involving duration of intervention with less than 8 weeks was classified as the short-term group, another study involving duration of intervention with 8 weeks or longer as the long-term group.

Risk of bias assessment

The risks of bias in the 11 individual studies included in this analysis are illustrated in Fig. 2. Regarding bias arising from the randomization process, 6 studies were rated as low-risk, and 5 studies indicated some concern. Regarding bias due to deviations from the intended interventions, bias due to missing outcome data, bias in outcome measurement, and selection bias, 11 studies were rated as low-risk.

Overall effect size of exercise therapy on balance after total hip arthroplasty

The balance analysis was based on 6 studies (Fig. 3). Significant differences were observed in the comparison of exercise therapy with the control group (SMD, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24–0.78; I2=22%).

Overall effect size of exercise therapy on gait after total hip arthroplasty

The gait analysis was based on 7 studies (Fig. 4). Significant differences were observed in the comparison of exercise therapy with the control group (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.01–0.76; I2=66%).

Effect size of exercise therapy on balance according to the duration of intervention

Subgroup analysis was based on the duration of intervention with short term and long term (Fig. 5). Significant differences were observed in the short-term group (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11–0.70; I2=0%). Furthermore, significant differences were observed in the long-term group (SMD, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.35 –1.64; I2=52%).

Effect size of exercise therapy on gait according to the duration of intervention

Subgroup analysis was based on the duration of intervention with short term and long term (Fig. 6). Significant differences were observed in the short-term group (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.12–0.93; I2=67%). However, no significant differences were observed in the long-term group (SMD, −0.13; 95% CI, −0.91 to 0.64; I2=0%).

Publication bias analysis of the effect of exercise therapy on patients after total hip arthroplasty

The visual analysis of publication bias in this study is as follows. As the graph is asymmetrical, it appears that publication bias exists (Fig. 7). The included studies are mainly distributed at the bottom of the graph, indicating that the sample sizes are small.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise therapy on the balance and gait of patients after THA. According to the results of this study, exercise therapy was found to be effective in improving both balance and gait.
There have been studies reporting balance impairment in patients after THA (Queen and Schmitt, 2021; Truszczyńska-Baszak et al., 2021; Wareńczak and Lisiński, 2020). However, there lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating patients’ balance after exercise therapy. The study found medium and small effect sizes for the effects on balance and gait. The relatively small effect sizes are thought to be due to the heterogeneity of exercise therapies, which were not independent interventions, resulting in medium (balance) and small (gait) effect sizes. All 11 studies included in this study performed additional exercise therapy after the intervention, the same as the control group. Since the intervention was performed on the patient after the surgery, there was also an effect of the intervention in the control group. The 11 studies included in this study used various exercise therapies ranging from strength training to aquatic exercise. Previous studies have reported that various interventions are used in exercise therapy for patients after THA (Di Monaco and Castiglioni, 2013; Wijnen et al., 2018). Therefore, it is believed that there may be heterogeneity between exercise therapies. Nevertheless, this study found that exercise therapy was effective in balance and gait in patients after THA. Balance disorders are associated with gait and falls (Sihvonen et al., 2009). If a patient experiences a fall after THA, additional fractures or dislocations may occur, leading to the need for revision surgery (Lands et al., 2021). Therefore, it is recommended for patients or rehabilitation specialists to perform systematic exercise therapy based on principles such as FITT in order to prevent falls.
This study conducted subgroup analysis based on the duration of intervention. Balance was significant in both the short and long term. However, gait was significant in the short term but not in the long term. Previous meta-analyses also showed significant results in gait speed (Wu et al., 2019). Studies included in the short term assessed gait using gait speed and 6-min walking test. The long term only included 6-min walking test. Previous studies reported that strength training did not have an impact on gait in the long term, as 6-min walking test assesses cardiopulmonary endurance during gait (Beaupre et al., 2014; Winther et al., 2018). It is important to consider which tools are used to assess gait.
This study has several limitations. The first limitation is that only English literature was included. The second limitation is that studies without sufficient data were not included. Future research that addresses these limitations will be necessary.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed that exercise therapy could improve balance and gait in patients after THA. Rehabilitation specialists recommend that exercise therapy be included in rehabilitation programs to improve balance and gait in patients after THA. Further research is needed in the future, including more studies and a network meta-analysis that analyzes the effect size of each exercise.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by research fund from Songwon University 2022 (C2022-02).

REFERENCES

Bahl JS, Nelson MJ, Taylor M, Solomon LB, Arnold JB, Thewlis D. Biomechanical changes and recovery of gait function after total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26:847–863.
crossref pmid

Bandholm T, Kehlet H. Physiotherapy exercise after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: time for reconsideration? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1292–1294.
crossref pmid

Beaupre LA, Masson EC, Luckhurst BJ, Arafah O, O’Connor GJ. A randomized pilot study of a comprehensive postoperative exercise program compared with usual care following primary total hip arthroplasty in subjects less than 65 years of age: feasibility, selection of outcome measures and timing of assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:192
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Bobić Lucić L, Grazio S. Impact of balance confidence on daily living activities of older people with knee osteoarthritis with regard to balance, physical function, pain, and quality of life - a preliminary report. Clin Gerontol. 2018;41:357–365.
crossref pmid

Chen X, Li X, Zhu Z, Wang H, Yu Z, Bai X. Effects of progressive resistance training for early postoperative fast-track total hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:1245–1253.
crossref pmid

Coulter CL, Scarvell JM, Neeman TM, Smith PN. Physiotherapist-directed rehabilitation exercises in the outpatient or home setting improve strength, gait speed and cadence after elective total hip replacement: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59:219–226.
crossref pmid

Di Laura Frattura G, Bordoni V, Feltri P, Fusco A, Candrian C, Filardo G. Balance remains impaired after hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:684
crossref pmid pmc

Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C. Which type of exercise therapy is effective after hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49:893–907. quiz 921–3.
pmid

Domínguez-Navarro F, Igual-Camacho C, Silvestre-Muñoz A, Roig-Casasús S, Blasco JM. Effects of balance and proprioceptive training on total hip and knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2018;62:68–74.
crossref pmid

Gademan MG, Hofstede SN, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:463
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP; American College of Sports Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–1359.
pmid

Greber EM, Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Anderson MB, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Challenges in total hip arthroplasty in the setting of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:S38–S44.
crossref pmid

Guyen O. Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty in recent femoral neck fractures? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:S95–S101.
crossref pmid

Hasebe Y, Akasaka K, Otsudo T, Hall T, Yamamoto M. Effects of incorporating elliptical trainer exercise during rehabilitation on physical function and self-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2022;34:230–235.
crossref pmid pmc

Hesse S, Werner C, Seibel H, von Frankenberg S, Kappel EM, Kirker S, Käding M. Treadmill training with partial body-weight support after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1767–1773.
pmid

Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393:1745–1759.
crossref pmid

Jakovljevič M, Vauhnik R. Aquatic exercises versus land based exercises for elderly patients after a total hip replacement. Zdrav Vestn. 2011;80:240–245.


Kuroda Y, Okuzu Y, Kawai T, Goto K, Matsuda S. Difference in therapeutic strategies for joint-preserving surgery for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head between the United States and Japan: a review of the literature. Orthop Surg. 2021;13:742–748.
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Labanca L, Ciardulli F, Bonsanto F, Sommella N, Di Martino A, Benedetti MG. Balance and proprioception impairment, assessment tools, and rehabilitation training in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:1055
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Lands H, Harm R, Hill M, Patel K, Spanyer J. Outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty exhibit similar early complication rates to inpatient procedures. J Orthop. 2021;27:69–73.
crossref pmid pmc

Lo CWT, Tsang WWN, Yan CH, Lord SR, Hill KD, Wong AYL. Risk factors for falls in patients with total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:979–993.
crossref pmid

Monaghan B, Cunningham P, Harrington P, Hing W, Blake C, O’ Dohertya D, Cusack T. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a physiotherapy-led functional exercise programme after total hip replacement. Physiotherapy. 2017;103:283–288.
crossref pmid

Nankaku M, Ikeguchi R, Goto K, So K, Kuroda Y, Matsuda S. Hip external rotator exercise contributes to improving physical functions in the early stage after total hip arthroplasty using an anterolateral approach: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2178–2183.
crossref pmid

Nguyen UDT, Perneger T, Franklin PD, Barea C, Hoffmeyer P, Lübbeke A. Improvement in mental health following total hip arthroplasty: the role of pain and function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:307
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Niemeijer A, Lund H, Stafne SN, Ipsen T, Goldschmidt CL, Jørgensen CT, Juhl CB. Adverse events of exercise therapy in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:1073–1080.
crossref pmid

Okoro T, Whitaker R, Gardner A, Maddison P, Andrew JG, Lemmey A. Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:173
crossref pmid pmc

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71
crossref pmid pmc

Peter WF, Nelissen RG, Vlieland TP. Guideline recommendations for post-acute postoperative physiotherapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty: are they used in daily clinical practice? Musculoskeletal Care. 2014;12:125–131.
crossref pmid

Picorelli AMA, Hatton AL, Gane EM, Smith MD. Balance performance in older adults with hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2018;65:89–99.
crossref pmid

Queen RM, Schmitt D. Sex-specific difference in dynamic balance following total hip replacement. Innov Aging. 2021. 5:igab019
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Rasch A, Byström AH, Dalen N, Berg HE. Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients with hip osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:505–510.
crossref pmid

Shabana M, Rahim AAAE, Abdelhakiem NM, Mabrouk MI, Essa MM. Impact of dynamic balance training on hip musculature moments and stability index in programming total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;8:839–849.


Shan L, Shan B, Graham D, Saxena A. Total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mid-term quality of life. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:389–406.
crossref pmid

Sihvonen S, Kulmala J, Kallinen M, Alén M, Kiviranta I, Sipila S. Postural balance and self-reported balance confidence in older adults with a hip fracture history. Gerontology. 2009;55:630–636.
crossref pmid pdf

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898
crossref pmid

Truszczyńska-Baszak A, Drzał-Grabiec J, Tarnowski A. Balance and functional disorders in geriatric patients after total hip prosthesis removal. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34:491–496.
crossref pmid

Unlu E, Eksioglu E, Aydog E, Aydog ST, Atay G. The effect of exercise on hip muscle strength, gait speed and cadence in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:706–711.
crossref pmid pdf

Wareńczak A, Lisiński P. Body balance a few years after total hip replacement. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020;22:87–96.
pmid

Wareńczak A, Lisiński P. Does total hip replacement impact on postural stability? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:229
pmid pmc

Wijnen A, Bouma SE, Seeber GH, van der Woude LHV, Bulstra SK, Lazovic D, Stevens M, van den Akker-Scheek I. The therapeutic validity and effectiveness of physiotherapeutic exercise following total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194517
crossref pmid pmc

Winther SB, Foss OA, Husby OS, Wik TS, Klaksvik J, Husby VS. A randomized controlled trial on maximal strength training in 60 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2018;89:295–301.
crossref pmid pmc

Wu JQ, Mao LB, Wu J. Efficacy of exercise for improving functional outcomes for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98:e14591
pmid pmc

Zavala-González J, Martínez D, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H. Effectiveness of adding virtual reality to physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36:660–668.
crossref pmid pdf

Fig. 1
Flowchart describing the study selection process.
jer-19-4-190f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Assessments of risk of bias.
jer-19-4-190f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Effect size of exercise therapy on balance after total hip arthroplasty. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
jer-19-4-190f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Effect size of exercise therapy on gait after total hip arthroplasty. SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
jer-19-4-190f4.jpg
Fig. 5
Effect size of exercise therapy on balance according to the duration of intervention. SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom.
jer-19-4-190f5.jpg
Fig. 6
Effect size of exercise therapy on gait according to the duration of intervention. SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom.
jer-19-4-190f6.jpg
Fig. 7
Publication bias analysis.
jer-19-4-190f7.jpg
Table 1
Characteristics of the included studies
Study Design Patients Outcome Exercise intervention Duration of intervention
Hesse et al. (2003) RCT
1. ETG (n=39)
2. CG (n=40)
n=79, THA patients (male=24 and female=55)
1. 64.7±13.1 yr
2. 65.5±9.9 yr
Gait velocity (gait) Treadmill exercise 10 Days
Unlu et al. (2007) RCT
1. ETG (n=9)
2. ETG (n=8)
3. CG (n=9)
n=26, THA patients (male=8 and female=18)
1. 45.44±8.70 yr
2. 57.75±7.45 yr
3. 52.55±10.32 yr
Gait speed and cadence (gait) 1. Home exercise
2. Supervision exercise
6 Weeks
Jakovljevič and Vauhnik (2011) RCT
1. ETG (n=12)
2. CG (n=12)
n=24, THA patients (male=11 and female=10)
1. 83.7±6.7 yr, 28.3±3.9 kg/m2
2. 80.2±7.2 yr, 27.9±4.2 kg/m2
TUG (balance) Aquatic exercise 8 Weeks
Beaupre et al. (2014) RCT
1. ETG (n=11)
2. CG (n=10)
n=21, THA patients (male=11 and female=10)
1. 51.7±8.3 yr
2. 55.9±9.9 yr
6MWT (gait) Strength and gait exercise 12 Weeks
Nankaku et al. (2016) RCT
1. ETG (n=14)
2. CG (n=14)
n=28, THA patients (male=4 and female=24)
1. 60.5±6.4 yr, 23.3±2.4 kg/m2
2. 60.8±7.5 yr, 22±2.9 kg/m2
TUG (balance) Hip external rotator exercise 4 Weeks
Okoro et al. (2016) RCT
1. ETG (n=25)
2. CG (n=24)
n=49, THA patients (male=24 and female=25)
1. 65.15±9.06 yr, 28.04±5.79 kg/m2
2. 66.33±11.02 yr, 29.44±4.25 kg/m2
6MWT (gait)
TUG (balance)
Progressive resistance exercise 6 Weeks
Monaghan et al. (2017) RCT
1. ETG (n=32)
2. CG (n=31)
n=63, THA patients (male=42 and female=21)
1. 68±8 yr
2. 69±9 yr
6MWT (gait) Functional exercise 6 Weeks
Winther et al. (2018) RCT
1. ETG (n=31)
2. CG (n=29)
n=60, THA patients (male=28 and female=32)
1. 61±35 yr, 28±4 kg/m2
2. 66±44 yr, 27±3 kg/m2
6MWT (gait) Maximal strength exercise 12 Weeks
Shabana et al. (2021) RCT
1. ETG (n=10)
2. CG (n=10)
n=20, THA patients (male=13 and female=7)
1. 58.4±4.48 yr
2. 61.9±7.31 yr
Biodex balance systems (balance) Balance exercise 12 Weeks
Hasebe et al. (2022) RCT
1. ETG (n=25)
2. CG (n=25)
n=50, THA patients (male=10 and female=40)
1. 69.3±8.7 yr, 23.4±3.1 kg/m2
2. 67.3±12.8 yr, 23.4±4.1 kg/m2
TUG (balance) Elliptical trainer exercise 1 Week
Zavala-González et al. (2022) RCT
1. ETG (n=36)
2. CG (n=37)
n=73, THA patients (male=35 and female=38)
1. 69.6±8.8 yr, 27.5±2.3 kg/m2
2. 69.9±8.8 yr, 27.4±2.3 kg/m2
BBS (balance)
6MWT (gait)
Virtual reality balance exercise 6 Weeks

RCT, randomized controlled trial; ETG, exercise therapy group; CG, control group; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TUG, Timed Up and Go; 6MWT, 6-min walking test; BBS, Berg balance scale.

Editorial Office
E-mail: journal@kser.co.kr
Copyright © Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation.            Developed in M2PI